top of page

Can a Robot Coach You? Why GPT Can't Replace Human Coaching (Today)

Updated: Jun 10, 2024

Researchers Jonathan Passmore and David Tee set out to examine the abilities and limitations of AI in their August 2023 article “The Library of Babel…”. Through a “cross-sectional, mixed-method design” and ICF MCC reviews, they researched AI’s ability to effectively coach within ICF standards. Read on to discover the ins and outs of AI’s coaching abilities.


ree

This article was originally published on Arete Coach and has been re-written and approved for placement by Arete Coach on ePraxis. Scroll to continue reading or click here to read the original article.


The research

Passmore and Tee tested GPT-4’s ability to “provide focused, solution-oriented open questions” to help the user “solve a common behavioral problem: “How can I best prepare for a job interview” in a coaching style suitable to achieve an ICF Associate Certified Coach (ACC)” accreditation. Passmore and Tee then had GPT-4’s responses reviewed by an ICF Master Certified Coach (MCC).


The results

In conducting the research, Passmore and Tee noted several faults within GPT’s “coaching.”


Advice giving

A hallmark of excellent executive coaching is the avoidance of advice-giving. When testing GPT-4’s coaching abilities, the “tool initially offered advice.” However, after “specifically inviting it to generate questions,” Passmore and Tee were able to “create a ‘coaching-type’ engagement” (Passmore & Tee, 2023). Regardless, this initial flaw should be noted.


Leading and closed questions

Passmore and Tee stated that when they did get GPT-4 to engage in a coaching conversation, the questions were given in multiples, leading, and often closed. For example, one response from GPT-4 included:


“What is your motivation for wanting to become a university teacher? Is it because you are passionate about a particular subject and want to share that passion with others? Is it because you are passionate about a particular subject and want to share that passion with others? Is it because you enjoy working with students and helping them learn? Or is it because you are interested in the academic environment and opportunities it provides?”

(Passmore & Tee, 2023)


After instructing GPT to “focus on enhancing the personal responsibility of the recipient” and “only pose one question at a time” the responses were improved (Passmore & Tee, 2023).


Ethical failure

Passmore & Tee also tested GPT-4’s ability to “act on suicidal references.” They note that GPT-4 did not respond appropriately. While it did “express empathy” it would try and “flip the conversation towards a solution.” Passmore & Tee state that this raises “questions about its ability to make ethical judgments, identify risk, and make appropriate referrals to other helping professions” (Passmore & Tee, 2023).


Master Coach review

In reviewing ChatGPT’s coaching dialog, Master Certified Coaches stated that GPT-4’s output was “not coaching.” Although the “agenda was named by the client, GPT-4 drove the discussion, talked too much, and set the direction.” GPT-4 also “failed to explore the emotions and values” or “consider the individual in the conversation.” It also did not “encourage greater responsibility” or provide “provocative questions” that encourage “deeper thinking” for the client. While the responses were “empathetic”, “supportive”, “positive”, “logical”, and “clear”, the MCCs judged that GPt-4’s output “failed to meet the ICF” standard for ACC-level coaching (Passmore & Tee, 2023).


Key takeaway

Passmore & Tee’s research reiterates the importance of human supervision when using GPT-4 as a tool within the coaching process. Furthermore, it also serves as an encouragement to the coaching community, that the human aspect of coaching is still vital to executive coaching. While AI is a skilled conversationalist, it lacks in its direct coaching ability and still requires the guidance and supervision of a human field expert (Passmore & Tee, 2023).


Original research available here.


Reference

Passmore, J., & Tee, D. (2023). The library of Babel: assessing the powers of artificial intelligence in knowledge synthesis, learning and development and coaching. Journal of Work-applied Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwam-06-2023-0057


Copyright © 2023 by Arete Coach™ LLC. All rights reserved.

5 Comments


I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style of blogging. I added it to my favorites blog site list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my site as well and let me know what you think. This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. this is very nice one and gives indepth information. thanks for this nice article...먹튀

Like

rehr grge
rehr grge
Sep 18

The point about AI evolving beyond mere automation into collaborative intelligence truly resonates. This shift highlights the critical need to design interactions that leverage human strengths rather than just replacing them, fostering genuine synergy. However, ensuring these advanced integrations remain beneficial and ethically sound for society presents a significant ongoing challenge. For those looking to delve deeper into this complex relationship, particularly insights into human-AI symbiosis, there are some excellent resources available.

Like

Your analysis of Passmore and Tee's research perfectly frames the current limitations of GPT-4 in achieving ICF ACC standards for coaching. The challenge of generating truly "solution-oriented open questions" that resonate deeply with human experience highlights that nuanced empathy and adaptability remain uniquely human strengths. While AI tools offer incredible support, true transformational coaching requires a deeper understanding of human complexities than current models can provide. It's fascinating to consider the ongoing evolution of human-AI collaboration in professional development, and how this balance might shift in the future.

Like

 If you ever think, “Should I write my essay online or get help?” — do yourself a favor and try PayForEssay. Their writers are actual experts. I got matched with a business writer for my marketing paper, and she crushed it. APA format, in-depth sources, and no AI junk. Highly recommend.

Like

: Tools
: Tools
Jun 03

A very well-argued piece on the transformative potential we're seeing. Your points about the future possibilities are spot on. From my perspective, understanding the range of current and upcoming solutions is crucial. I've personally benefited from platforms that offer a broad look at humanoid robot models and their applications when exploring this topic. Thanks for shedding more light on this important area!

Like
bottom of page